<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Open and Run 32-bit Command Prompt in 64-bit (x64) Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/</link>
	<description>Tips and Tricks on Computing, Technology and Gadgets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:50:39 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-10946</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-10946</guid>
		<description>thankkk youuuu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankkk youuuu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balaji Ramanujam</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>Balaji Ramanujam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using 64 bit version Windows Vista.
I try to run a windows batch file.
It is showing an error that &quot;This 32 bit version is not supported by this version&quot;

Wat to do?
Plz give an solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using 64 bit version Windows Vista.<br />
I try to run a windows batch file.<br />
It is showing an error that &#8220;This 32 bit version is not supported by this version&#8221;</p>
<p>Wat to do?<br />
Plz give an solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misty</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-8406</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-8406</guid>
		<description>Lynda

I have had my computer for close to 4 months and never realized I had two versions of internet explorer. I could never figure out why I could sometimes view movies etc. but most of the time I couldn&#039;t. Thank you so much for letting me in on the secret!!!!

Misty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynda</p>
<p>I have had my computer for close to 4 months and never realized I had two versions of internet explorer. I could never figure out why I could sometimes view movies etc. but most of the time I couldn&#8217;t. Thank you so much for letting me in on the secret!!!!</p>
<p>Misty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>Many people with new computers, especially those upgrading from Windows 98 to Windows Vista, discover that they are unable to view a movie, etc. because of the 64 bit / 32 bit issue.  For most of us who are computer users but not technically literate, the error message freaks us out and we go in search of a &quot;fix.&quot;  Your article is the CLOSEST thing to that &quot;fix&quot; that comes up in a quick google search ... but it is inaccurate.

The TRUE response is this, (and therefore something you might want to publish, too): If the above scenario is what has happened to you, it is likely that your new computer has TWO versions of Internet Explorer!  Click on Start to look at all your programs, and you should see both of them listed together, with the second one listed as &quot;Internet Explorer (64 bit)&quot;  According to Microsoft, the 32-bit version of IE is the one they put up for the shortcut when you click on the globe icon.  To check which version of IE your shortcut pulls up, click on it then click on help, then click on &quot;about internet explorer.&quot; If the cipher strength says 256 bits, it is the 32-bit version.

When websites start catching up, we can use the 64-bit version (which looks better) more often.  This is why Microsoft loaded two versions for us.  Kinda smart, really. Just dumb not to have let us know somehow...

LCW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people with new computers, especially those upgrading from Windows 98 to Windows Vista, discover that they are unable to view a movie, etc. because of the 64 bit / 32 bit issue.  For most of us who are computer users but not technically literate, the error message freaks us out and we go in search of a &#8220;fix.&#8221;  Your article is the CLOSEST thing to that &#8220;fix&#8221; that comes up in a quick google search &#8230; but it is inaccurate.</p>
<p>The TRUE response is this, (and therefore something you might want to publish, too): If the above scenario is what has happened to you, it is likely that your new computer has TWO versions of Internet Explorer!  Click on Start to look at all your programs, and you should see both of them listed together, with the second one listed as &#8220;Internet Explorer (64 bit)&#8221;  According to Microsoft, the 32-bit version of IE is the one they put up for the shortcut when you click on the globe icon.  To check which version of IE your shortcut pulls up, click on it then click on help, then click on &#8220;about internet explorer.&#8221; If the cipher strength says 256 bits, it is the 32-bit version.</p>
<p>When websites start catching up, we can use the 64-bit version (which looks better) more often.  This is why Microsoft loaded two versions for us.  Kinda smart, really. Just dumb not to have let us know somehow&#8230;</p>
<p>LCW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>I wrote a program which spawn a process. On running it on CLI x86 it display the output message of the spawned process where on x64 I was not able to find the display of spawned process output. Please help me on this. Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a program which spawn a process. On running it on CLI x86 it display the output message of the spawned process where on x64 I was not able to find the display of spawned process output. Please help me on this. Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian sebryk</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>ian sebryk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>i thought that might be a solution, but before i tried it, i tried just running it from a normal shell, instead of through the batchfile that launched the app in question, and it worked fine.  so much weirdness.

the batchfile no longer works, but direct command line does.  how weird is that?!

i&#039;ll also try a different path without brackets to see if that re-enables my batchfile&#039;s ability to launch.  reaaaly need the batchfile to work again...  :)

thank Nicholas.  i&#039;ll keep you posted.

WR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought that might be a solution, but before i tried it, i tried just running it from a normal shell, instead of through the batchfile that launched the app in question, and it worked fine.  so much weirdness.</p>
<p>the batchfile no longer works, but direct command line does.  how weird is that?!</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll also try a different path without brackets to see if that re-enables my batchfile&#8217;s ability to launch.  reaaaly need the batchfile to work again&#8230;  <img src='http://www.tipandtrick.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>thank Nicholas.  i&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<p>WR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Dille</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Dille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>I may be dipping the raft but I reckon the TCL interpreter does not allow brackets in the path to a file which it is about to source.

Does it help to move the installation directory to a location outside of &quot;c:\Program Files (x86)&quot;, e.g. &quot;c:\progs&quot;?

Hope that helps,
Nicholas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be dipping the raft but I reckon the TCL interpreter does not allow brackets in the path to a file which it is about to source.</p>
<p>Does it help to move the installation directory to a location outside of &#8220;c:\Program Files (x86)&#8221;, e.g. &#8220;c:\progs&#8221;?</p>
<p>Hope that helps,<br />
Nicholas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian sebryk</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>ian sebryk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>i tried using your advice to try and get some 32bit apps to run a bit better on my 64bit box.  problem is, now i get weird errors from some key software.  i don&#039;t know how to undo the change... which may serve me right for swimming in deep waters...

throw me a raft, ya?

here&#039;s a sample error that showed up mid-execution after i&#039;d run the %windir%\SysWoW64\cmd.exe command:

Error: can&#039;t define &quot;ProgramFiles(x86)&quot;: name refers to an element in an array
while evaluating script: namespace eval :: {source {C:/Program Files (x86)/[directory tree]/RMSExpression.tcl}}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tried using your advice to try and get some 32bit apps to run a bit better on my 64bit box.  problem is, now i get weird errors from some key software.  i don&#8217;t know how to undo the change&#8230; which may serve me right for swimming in deep waters&#8230;</p>
<p>throw me a raft, ya?</p>
<p>here&#8217;s a sample error that showed up mid-execution after i&#8217;d run the %windir%\SysWoW64\cmd.exe command:</p>
<p>Error: can&#8217;t define &#8220;ProgramFiles(x86)&#8221;: name refers to an element in an array<br />
while evaluating script: namespace eval :: {source {C:/Program Files (x86)/[directory tree]/RMSExpression.tcl}}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Dille</title>
		<link>http://www.tipandtrick.net/2008/how-to-open-and-run-32-bit-command-prompt-in-64-bit-x64-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Dille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipandtrick.net/?p=1176#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>As you described in the article, the original %SystemRoot%\System32 is not accessible to 32-bit processes. Unfortunately, there are several tools existing uniquely as 64-bit binaries (e.g. logogg.exe and tsshutdn.exe). In one of my articles, I describe two techniques circumventing the limitation of launching 64-bit system tools from 32-bit processes: http://blogs.sepago.de/nicholas/2008/03/13/jailed-32-bit-processes-on-windows-x64/

Enjoy,
Nicholas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you described in the article, the original %SystemRoot%\System32 is not accessible to 32-bit processes. Unfortunately, there are several tools existing uniquely as 64-bit binaries (e.g. logogg.exe and tsshutdn.exe). In one of my articles, I describe two techniques circumventing the limitation of launching 64-bit system tools from 32-bit processes: <a href="http://blogs.sepago.de/nicholas/2008/03/13/jailed-32-bit-processes-on-windows-x64/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sepago.de/nicholas/2008/03/13/jailed-32-bit-processes-on-windows-x64/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy,<br />
Nicholas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
